Posts Tagged ‘Global’
Global Warming – All (not) want to know!
Cover Meter ConcreteGlobal Warming – All (not) want to know!
A wise up, cynical and political "follow the money" – is global warming is real? Global warming and the human causation – there are two sequential scientific truth – or represent a political ideology that broke? Is this really the world's global warming carbon emissions and the greenhouse effect – and is a real threat to the planet's oceans rise to flooding of urban centers? And 'caused by the disregard for the humanity of pollution from fossil fuels – without causing vomiting for almost acentury fireplaces, factories, automobiles, airplanes? O (for right-wing extremism, fear) is only a "tsunami of propaganda" radical left-wing ideologues, the use of politicized pseudo-science "to the field at the international level the playing field" to penalize capitalism and the United Kingdom States?
The Ugly Truth (interest from time to time) is the recent unprecedented meeting in Copenhagen for all the world leaders in December 2009 to 193 countries, with a full team and its surroundings: the democracieskingdoms, dictatorships, the countries of the world's first industrial consortia in the Third World to fight against hunger – about the use of-a-town to impose severe restrictions that disrupt civilization, and a financial penalty effective industrial activities! What could be the role of force to organize a meeting with this program?
Two considerations should give pause to a reasonable person – because of the dramatic changes and sanctions – not to be aPreamble to the session of science, establishing incontrovertible proof of the premise, the first of this kind of extreme decisions were looking for? The revelations of e-mails leaked before the conference in Britain – the temperature data input faked – was a reaction of surprise the scientific community to this challenge to the trust loan, which was a race to recover trust in the completion of high temperature Global? Instead, what the world saw was "cooked" the revelations of the temperatureswept "under the carpet", an initiative to the media to "kill the messenger" (hackers, e-mail). As can be detrimental to the objective of the spirits? The lack of preview to show the landscape of global warming and the scientific mode of concealment – is a discovery of powerful political machinations and the order of the day is not reasonable?
Also note, the U.S. House of Representatives has already approved a law of emissions trading, as if – new-anthropogenic global warming is a fact – with hundreds ofbillion lifelong consequences for the U.S. industry ($ 1,700 to $ 2,000 per household per year estimated billion, the value of GE, etc.), just waiting for Senate action comparable to be signed by President Obama! Or worse – the authority of the Presidential Decree, the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) has taken the government to set pollution standards for the industry costs of America (not even waiting for a U.S. Senate Bill! )
On the other hand – if one accepts the 'scenario of global warming – anthropogenic pollution from industrialized nations is one of the major countries, emerging economies (India and China), then make a convincing argument: since all share the Earth, where industrialized countries have so far had a great advantage of head start – using cheap energy and carbon emissions cause / pollutants – should not be returned to the countries of their right to "recover", not the United States and other industrialized countries pay heavy(Perhaps a billion dollars a year – especially in the U.S.)?
The international consensus on the scope and size of the Copenhagen conference that has never seen before: the rebellion against the powers of the world is not military, nor against the dominant religion or political ideology – just a target for reducing carbon and to impose sanctions. People see right political ideology, has resulted in unprecedented international business: a combination of left-wing governments, and join the mediaCommunist dictators openly in each hemisphere. Even the commentators considered the world stage, like Charles Krauthammer, is something wrong!
So what really scientific experts in the technical area of the Earth's atmosphere to say? Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D., is professor of atmospheric sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and has written extensively on the subject. His analysis is summarized below in an attempt to separate "the wheat from the ball" for lay-menunderstanding – that global warming is actually really happens, and if human industrial emissions are the immediate cause, and if the threat to the planet Earth is indeed imminent. These are the topics of conversation Professor Lindzen is:
Despite the exaggerated emotions, referring to the statements, surface temperatures have shown cycles of cooling and warming over a century: 1875-1910 cooling, heating, 1911-1943, 1944-1976 cooling, heating 1977-1998, but notheating – cooling eighth year we are experiencing. While all these changes occurred, the levels of carbon dioxide has increased steadily.
There are five centers worldwide that collect data on global temperatures: the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (where the data leakage current e-mail instead of forged) Remote Sensing Systems, University of Alabama in Huntsville, the Goddard Institute for Space Studies Board and the Commission of National Oceanic and AtmosphericOf Directors. These temperature data centers show no warming since 1998, and all show a gradual cooling since then.
Problems (to be honest scientific projections) occur when using the record of surface temperature of about trends in the number of sites around the world measuring climate has increased from 6,000 in 1970 to less than 2000 Today, two thirds weather stations were closed in rural areas (cooler night temperatures), while others are a greatpercentage of urban sites (read warmer at night because of concrete pavements, buildings and urban sprawl). This harms the only record of global temperature, such as urban areas around the world have grown exponentially over the past 50 years – studies show that perhaps half of the "warm up" the database of the last fifty years is attributable to changes Land use – not the increase in energy emissions. Urban growth is the main cause of a man rise in temperature data.
NASA isquoted as saying that the oceans were warmer in the summer of 2009, compared to the past – is calculated by subtracting the temperature of the ocean temperature measured from the base of satellite data – however, NASA did not use the ARGO program (over 3300) the floating in the oceans of the world – which, however, show the heat content of the ocean beneath the buoys were deployed in 2003.
There is no statistical relationship between atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and temperatures over the past 150 years – buta strong statistical correlation between the cyclical Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and global temperature. The name is an 60-year cycle of warming and cooling of the Pacific Ocean – in all cases in the last 150 years when the PDO was cooling, global temperatures cooled, when the denomination of origin warming, global temperature has increased . The name has moved back to a cooling phase – such as air temperature.
Total carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is only 4 centspercent (.0004 of the atmosphere in total). The overall increase in the volume of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere over the past 150 years is only one hundredth of one percent (0.0001). This has actually benefited agriculture and the life of the plants that grow faster with more carbon dioxide (the famous animal-plant symbiosis – the exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide), and are more resistant to drought.
Carbon dioxide is a pollutant – everything that grows in the soil it needs, the source is irrelevant. If allCarbon dioxide is removed from the air (breathing animals), the earth would die.
Ice cores show that rising carbon dioxide in the past were the result of warmer temperatures, not the cause of it. The laws of nature has not changed. Most of the increases in carbon dioxide in the air are the result of nature, the human component is small, perhaps 3 percent. Furthermore, half the carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere annually by human activities, it is immediately absorbed in the biosphere. CarbonCarbon dioxide is 3.5 per cent of greenhouse gases – water vapor is 95 percent. As human activity adds only 3 per cent a year, with half of that absorbed in the biosphere, the total contribution of humans to global warming each year is about one tenth of a percentage point. Reduce this amount by a fraction will have no significant effect on global temperatures.
There is a strong (ignored by supporters of the heating pro-) between the strength of the solar wind and global temperature.Strong solar wind is equal to a warmer Earth, the solar wind is weak as the Earth's coldest. The variations in cosmogenic isotopes carbon-14 and beryllium-10 in ice cores show. At this time the solar wind is weaker than ever that NASA was able to measure that (almost 50) and cools the earth. The solar magnetic index is the lowest since measurements began in 1932 and falling. The Pacific Ocean is in a cooling phase, and will continue for the next 25 years. The Atlantic is showingsigns of cooling. Heat from the sun is low and probably will for the next two solar cycles. We headed for the cooler temperatures, not warm.
The cyclical downturn the amount of ice in the Arctic at the end of the summer is over. Satellite in polar orbit, clearly show the extent of Arctic ice, which is growing – there are 25 percent more ice time in two years (spectacular photos of the drastic reduction in Arctic ice for several decades are misleading -probably intentionally).
Satellite measurements show that there is more ice in Antarctica 30 years ago – News media reported that melting Arctic ice is not the growth of ice in Antarctica.
The melting of glaciers is not new. The "Little Ice Age" was from 1400-1850. The lowest temperatures were in 1600. The global temperature has increased unevenly over 300 years. The glaciers are retreating were unevenly at least 250 years.
The Satellite series data of the Earth's radiation budgetoutgoing radiation (heat) increased by 4 watts per square meter in 1980 and 1990, while the oceans were warming cycle. The computer models slated for release longwave radiation decreases as the heating of the sea. All the models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is wrong. (Note, the following IPCC).
This indicates a clear desire to make a political point of view of ecology more than honest, Time magazine in 2009The article, with the participation of the major environmental groups, reported that there were "only" 25,000 polar bears in the Arctic region today – omitting the fact that in 1960, the number was, but 5000,
Some important observations of Dr. Lindzen reach the center of their concerns about the scientific accuracy of global warming "sellathon" and the possible motivation – to "follow the money" considerations, the words are indicated;
CO2 – what is it? It is not a pollutant, CO2 is a productBreathing all living beings is the product of all plant respiration, is essential for plant life and photosynthesis, which is a product of industrial fires, which is a product of [car] driver – I mean, if you ever wanted a point of leverage to control everything from the expiry of the human journey would be a dream. Therefore, there is a sort of attraction of the key bureaucratic mentality.
The most important groups of environmental, political "leaders" and environmentalists believe: onlyreduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and can regulate the temperature of the world. People who think this way is much more dangerous than global warming itself (if true), because some of these have the power of great people.
Computer models say that there must be a rapid warming of the upper troposphere – between 30 degrees north and south of Ecuador – if global warming is underway. However, measurements with weather balloons in the last 50 years show no warming.This shows that computer models do not predict how the climate system – [allow] the climate 50 to 100 years in the future. The computer model predictions of global warming is not evidence of climate change. They are marketing tools to research institutions and universities to continue their funding of our government. Although the motivation to return, this means that the models make false assumptions about how the climate of the complexity of the work, and are scientifically useless to make any change in policy.
TheUnited Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was established in 1980 to "prove" the fire of the human causes of global warming – from the beginning, was never a scientific organization – was established by an order of the day part of the policy. The real goal is to capture political power of the dominant countries in the climate treaty (Kyoto) – in part to ensure the survival of their institutions. These agreements give the United Nations the legal power to redistribute wealth in developed countriesnation. The concept of "climate debt" to the Third World is the justification. The debt would be the punishment for the sin of the industrialized nation of "pollute" the atmosphere with carbon dioxide – with all the carbon in the air space. This is the UN target for the use of global warming to get money from developed countries, without working for it. Recently, the IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri said: "We are at a point where global warming is occurring at a much faster pace."Apparently not, since the actual data.
As for Al Gore received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007 – his message of fear of global warming is now called the Third "climate compensation" for the global damage that the West has imposed on the climate over the past 150 years. Now they say we need to "climate debt", because it uses the entire space of carbon in the air. This is not the promotion of peace, which is the source of tension and anger in developing countries to the west – Gore"Peace" is having the opposite effect. As for financial investments in companies with green Gore "by the prophets for profit." The desire to save the world is always a pretext for the necessity of the rule. "
The "Climategate" e-mails show that is not the best, the blind ambition of some of the world's scientists on climate change – and at worst criminal activity. The reaction of most media in the United States is proving to be very revealing. Or not declaredhistory or who defend the actions of climate scientists. Some of these eminent scientists were surprised to intimidate scientific journals to keep the ball skeptical of publication and editing of data for the human case of global warming. The emails also reveal that these scientists have suppressed data, or refuse free to request information, and delete emails relating to these requests, a criminal offense. Goddard Institute for Space Studies, was also evasiveFreedom of information efforts. It 'clear that the e-mail to a small but powerful group of climate scientists have used their high positions led to pervert the science of climate change.
Beyond the realm of hard scientific data points, such as wind speed and direction of the temperature, air and sea, places and dates, Dr. Lindzen extrapolate their knowledge of the limits of mathematical models of speculation on the motivation of atmospheric scientists proclamations of the timeanthropogenic global warming. The term "follow the money" has often proven to be a roadmap to explain the otherwise baffling activities. Many powerful groups and organizations have a financial interest in a strong belief that the U.S. carbon dioxide pollution: the country that includes influential environmental groups, brokerage firms, corporations, universities, media and political parties and governments of Third World. The test is extensive – and the cash-strapped statescities, with hundreds of millions in federal funds for decades, "green energy", the development of the study – while the essential software infrastructure such as water pipes, roads and bridges, are not capitalized. In the scenario of the UN, the guilt of the liberal conscience, and have become a way of spreading the wealth around the world.
Some of the observations to notify Dr. Lindzen order:
The day of the conference has opened in Copenhagen, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, saidjurisdiction over the regulation of carbon emissions in the United States – has categorically declared "in danger" to human health.
From the USA has a strong economy based on carbon, the EPA claims the authority to regulate almost everything. No institution issuing more than 250 tonnes of C02 per year, will be above the EPA control – over one million residential complexes, hospitals, factories, schools, shops and other similar businesses.
The simplest statement of the executive (presidential)on behalf of the 'environment is the perfect realization of the prediction of Czech President Vaclav Klaus, that environmentalism has become the new socialism. Entering the possibility of even darker motives, Dr. Lindzen says one phase of the socialist world – the licensor of U.S. sovereihnity the United Nations, with the domination of the United Nations ultra-liberal (NC)-Arab Islamic countries control oil.
Such are serious concerns expressed by otherscientists, including the cost of the United Nations 'fraud' on climate change – Dr Philip Lloyd, Honorary Research Fellow at the Center for Energy Research, University of Cape Town, South Africa, was one of the authors to coordinate UN IPCC . According to Dr. Lloyd, the IPCC should be dismissed as an authority on global warming – in an article published on the website of South Africa's BusinessDay. Lloyd writes about the "flaws behind the whole process" of the IPCC
TheIPCC "claims to have thousands of scientists and critics about the same amount to produce their reports." However, Lloyd said he had not considered "in the usual sense of the term -. There was no independent review, and anonymous reviewers were, but all the results are not scientific."
Another problem mentioned by Lloyd to present a summary of the IPCC (for politicians) four months or more before the scientific report (which is supposed to be based) is published.
Lloyd concludes:"There is no need to list all the changes that have been identified between what scientists actually said and what the politicians who wrote the summary for policy-makers said they said. The process is so flawed, the result is equivalent to fraud. as authority, the IPCC should be relegated to the scrap away. "
Lloyd was the first article of the scandal known as climategate, which questioned the validity of some of the scientists of the IPCC, which supports the conclusionman of global warming.
On a related note, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, after the eruption of the dispute climategate recognized that support for the science of global warming, man can not be "safe, as claimed by its supporters." The common sense of the commentators on the world stage, like Charles Krauthammer, trying to find an explanation for the phenomenon of global warming, described him as "environmentalism – the new religion of the liberal left."
Cover Meter Concrete
Global Warming – All (not) want to know!
Cover Meter ConcreteGlobal Warming – All (not) want to know!
A wise up, cynical and political "follow the money" – is global warming is real? Global warming and the human causation – there are two sequential scientific truth – or represent a political ideology that broke? Is this land truly global carbon emissions and greenhouse warming – and a real threat to the planet's oceans rise to flooding of urban centers? And 'caused by the disregard for the humanity of pollution from fossil fuels – without causing vomiting for almost acentury fireplaces, factories, automobiles, airplanes? O (for right-wing extremism, fear) is only a "tsunami of propaganda" radical left-wing ideologues, the use of politicized pseudo-science "to the field at the international level the playing field" to penalize capitalism and the United Kingdom States?
The Ugly Truth (interest from time to time) is the recent unprecedented meeting in Copenhagen for all the world leaders in December 2009 to 193 countries, with a full team and its surroundings: the democracieskingdoms, dictatorships, the countries of the world's first industrial consortia in the Third World to fight against hunger – about the use of-a-town to impose severe restrictions that disrupt civilization, and a financial penalty effective industrial activities! What could be the role of force to organize a meeting with this program?
Two considerations should give pause to a reasonable person – because of the dramatic changes and sanctions – not to be aPreamble to the session of science, establishing incontrovertible proof of the premise, the first of this kind of extreme decisions were looking for? The revelations of e-mails leaked before the conference in Britain – the temperature data input faked – was a reaction of surprise the scientific community to this challenge to the trust loan, which was a race to recover trust in the completion of high temperature Global? Instead, what the world saw was "cooked" the revelations of the temperatureswept "under the carpet", an initiative to the media to "kill the messenger" (hackers, e-mail). As can be detrimental to the objective of the spirits? The lack of preview to show the landscape of global warming and the scientific mode of concealment – is a discovery of powerful political machinations and the order of the day is not reasonable?
Also note, the U.S. House of Representatives has already approved a law of emissions trading, as if – new-anthropogenic global warming is a fact – with hundreds ofbillion lifelong consequences for the U.S. industry ($ 1,700 to $ 2,000 per household per year estimated billion, the value of GE, etc.), just waiting for Senate action comparable to be signed by President Obama! Or worse – the authority of the Presidential Decree, the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) has taken the government to set pollution standards for the industry costs of America (not even waiting for a U.S. Senate Bill! )
On the other hand – if one accepts the 'scenario of global warming – anthropogenic pollution from industrialized nations is one of the major countries, emerging economies (India and China), then make a convincing argument: since all share the Earth, where industrialized countries have so far been very advantage of head start – using cheap energy and carbon emissions cause / pollutants – should not be returned to the countries of their right to "recover", not the United States and other industrialized countries pay heavy(Perhaps a billion dollars a year – especially in the U.S.)?
The international consensus on the scope and size of the Copenhagen conference that has never seen before: the rebellion against the powers of the world is not military, nor against the dominant religion or political ideology – just a target for reducing carbon and to impose sanctions. People see right political ideology, has resulted in unprecedented international business: a combination of left-wing governments and join the mediaCommunist dictators openly in each hemisphere. Even the commentators considered the world stage, like Charles Krauthammer, is something wrong!
So what really scientific experts in the technical area of the Earth's atmosphere to say? Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D., is professor of atmospheric sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and has written extensively on the subject. His analysis is summarized below in an attempt to separate "the wheat from the ball" for lay-menunderstanding – that global warming is actually really happens, and if human industrial emissions are the immediate cause, and if the threat to the planet Earth is indeed imminent. These are the topics of conversation Professor Lindzen is:
Despite the exaggerated emotions, referring to the statements, surface temperatures have shown cycles of cooling and warming over a century: cooling 1875-1910, 1911-1943 heating, cooling, 1944-1976, 1977-1998 warming, but notheating – cooling eighth year we are experiencing. While all these changes occurred, the levels of carbon dioxide has increased steadily.
There are five centers worldwide that collect data on global temperatures: the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (where the data leakage current e-mail instead of forged) Remote Sensing Systems, University of Alabama in Huntsville, the Goddard Institute for Space Studies Board and the Commission of National Oceanic and AtmosphericAdministration. These temperature data centers show no warming since 1998, and all show a gradual cooling since then.
Problems (to be honest scientific projections) occur when using the record of surface temperature of about trends in the number of sites around the world measuring climate has increased from 6,000 in 1970 to less than 2000 Today, two thirds weather stations were closed in rural areas (cooler night temperatures), while others are a greatpercentage of urban sites (read warmer at night because of concrete pavements, buildings and urban sprawl). This harms the only record of global temperature, such as urban areas around the world have grown exponentially over the past 50 years – studies show that perhaps half of the "warm up" the database of the last fifty years is attributable to changes Land use – not the increase in energy emissions. Urban growth is the main cause of a man rise in temperature data.
NASA isquoted as saying that the oceans were warmer in the summer of 2009, compared to the past – is calculated by subtracting the temperature of the ocean temperature measured from the base of satellite data – however, NASA did not use the ARGO program (over 3300) the floating in the oceans of the world – which, however, show the heat content of the ocean beneath the buoys were deployed in 2003.
There is no statistical relationship between atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and temperatures over the past 150 years – buta strong statistical correlation between the cyclical Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and global temperature. The name is an 60-year cycle of warming and cooling of the Pacific Ocean – in all cases in the last 150 years when the PDO was cooling, global temperatures cooled, when the denomination of origin warming, global temperature has increased . The name has moved back to a cooling phase – such as air temperature.
Total carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is only 4 centspercent (.0004 of the atmosphere in total). The overall increase in the volume of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere over the past 150 years is only one hundredth of one percent (0.0001). This has actually benefited agriculture and the life of the plants that grow faster with more carbon dioxide (the famous animal-plant symbiosis – the exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide), and are more resistant to drought.
Carbon dioxide is a pollutant – everything that grows in the soil it needs, the source is irrelevant. If allCarbon dioxide is removed from the air (breathing animals), the earth would die.
Ice cores show that rising carbon dioxide in the past were the result of warmer temperatures, not the cause of it. The laws of nature has not changed. Most of the increases in carbon dioxide in the air are the result of nature, the human component is small, perhaps 3 percent. Furthermore, half the carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere annually by human activities, it is immediately absorbed in the biosphere. CarbonCarbon dioxide is 3.5 per cent of greenhouse gases – water vapor is 95 percent. As human activity adds only 3 per cent a year, with half of that absorbed in the biosphere, the total contribution of humans to global warming each year is about one tenth of a percentage point. Reduce this amount by a fraction will have no significant effect on global temperatures.
There is a strong (ignored by supporters of the heating pro-) between the strength of the solar wind and global temperature.Strong solar wind is equal to a warmer Earth, the solar wind is weak as the Earth's coldest. The variations in cosmogenic isotopes carbon-14 and beryllium-10 in ice cores show. At this time the solar wind is weaker than ever that NASA was able to measure that (almost 50) and cools the earth. The solar magnetic index is the lowest since measurements began in 1932 and falling. The Pacific Ocean is in a cooling phase, and will continue for the next 25 years. The Atlantic is showingsigns of cooling. Heat from the sun is low and probably will for the next two solar cycles. We headed for the cooler temperatures, not warm.
The cyclical downturn the amount of ice in the Arctic at the end of the summer is over. Satellite in polar orbit, clearly show the extent of Arctic ice, which is growing – there are 25 percent more ice time in two years (spectacular photos of the drastic reduction in Arctic ice for several decades are misleading -probably intentionally).
Satellite measurements show that there is more ice in Antarctica 30 years ago – News media reported that melting Arctic ice is not the growth of ice in Antarctica.
The melting of glaciers is not new. The "Little Ice Age" was from 1400-1850. The lowest temperatures were in 1600. The global temperature has increased unevenly over 300 years. The glaciers are retreating were unevenly at least 250 years.
The Satellite series data of the Earth's radiation budgetoutgoing radiation (heat) increased by 4 watts per square meter in 1980 and 1990, while the oceans were warming cycle. The computer models slated for release longwave radiation decreases as the heating of the sea. All the models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is wrong. (Note, the following IPCC).
This indicates a clear desire to make a political point of view of ecology more than honest, Time magazine in 2009The article, with the participation of the major environmental groups, reported that there were "only" 25,000 polar bears in the Arctic region today – omitting the fact that in 1960, the number was, but 5000,
Some important observations of Dr. Lindzen reach the center of their concerns about the scientific accuracy of global warming "sellathon" and the possible motivation – to "follow the money" considerations, the words are indicated;
CO2 – what is it? It is not a pollutant, CO2 is a productBreathing all living beings is the product of all plant respiration, is essential for plant life and photosynthesis, which is a product of industrial fires, which is a product of [car] driver – I mean, if you ever wanted a point of leverage to control everything from the expiry of the human journey would be a dream. Therefore, there is a sort of attraction of the key bureaucratic mentality.
The most important groups of environmental, political "leaders" and environmentalists believe: onlyreduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and can regulate the temperature of the world. People who think this way is much more dangerous than global warming itself (if true), because some of these have the power of great people.
Computer models say that there must be a rapid warming of the upper troposphere – between 30 degrees north and south of Ecuador – if global warming is underway. However, measurements with weather balloons in the last 50 years show no warming.This shows that computer models do not predict how the climate system – [allow] the climate 50 to 100 years in the future. The computer model predictions of global warming is not evidence of climate change. They are marketing tools to research institutions and universities to continue their funding of our government. Although the motivation to return, this means that the models make false assumptions about how the climate of the complexity of the work, and are scientifically useless to make any change in policy.
TheUnited Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was established in 1980 to "prove" the fire of the human causes of global warming – from the beginning, was never a scientific organization – was established by an order of the day part of the policy. The real goal is to capture political power of the dominant countries in the climate treaty (Kyoto) – in part to ensure the survival of their institutions. These agreements give the United Nations the legal power to redistribute wealth in developed countriesnation. The concept of "climate debt" to the Third World is the justification. The debt would be the punishment for the sin of the industrialized nation of "pollute" the atmosphere with carbon dioxide – with all the carbon in the air space. This is the UN target for the use of global warming to get money from developed countries, without working for it. Recently, the IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri said: "We are at a point where global warming is occurring at a much faster pace."Apparently not, since the actual data.
As for Al Gore received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007 – his message of fear of global warming is now called the Third "climate compensation" for the global damage that the West has imposed on the climate over the past 150 years. Now they say we need to "climate debt", because it uses the entire space of carbon in the air. This is not the promotion of peace, which is the source of tension and anger in developing countries to the west – Gore"Peace" is having the opposite effect. As for financial investments in companies with green Gore "by the prophets for profit." The desire to save the world is always a pretext for the necessity of the rule. "
The "Climategate" e-mails show that is not the best, the blind ambition of some of the world's scientists on climate change – and at worst criminal activity. The reaction of most media in the United States is proving to be very revealing. Or not declaredhistory or who defend the actions of climate scientists. Some of these eminent scientists were surprised to intimidate scientific journals to keep the ball skeptical of publication and editing of data for the human case of global warming. The emails also reveal that these scientists have data deleted or refused to freedom of information requests, and delete emails relating to these requests, a criminal offense. Goddard Institute for Space Studies, was also evasiveThe efforts of freedom of information. It 'clear that the e-mail to a small but powerful group of climate scientists have used their high positions led to pervert the science of climate change.
Beyond the realm of hard scientific data points, such as wind speed and direction of the temperature, air and sea, places and dates, Dr. Lindzen extrapolate their knowledge of the limits of mathematical models of speculation on the motivation of atmospheric scientists proclamations of the timeanthropogenic global warming. The term "follow the money" has often proven to be a roadmap to explain the otherwise baffling activities. Many powerful groups and organizations have a financial interest in a strong belief that the U.S. carbon dioxide pollution: the country that includes influential environmental groups, brokerage firms, corporations, universities, media and political parties and governments of Third World. The test is extensive – and the cash-strapped statescities, with hundreds of millions in federal funds for decades, "green energy", the development of the study – while the essential software infrastructure such as water pipes, roads and bridges, are not capitalized. In the scenario of the UN, the guilt of the liberal conscience, and have become a way of spreading the wealth around the world.
Some of the observations to notify Dr. Lindzen order:
The day of the conference has opened in Copenhagen, the Environmental Protection Agency has said the United Statesjurisdiction over the regulation of carbon emissions in the United States – has categorically declared "in danger" to human health.
From the USA has a strong economy based on carbon, the EPA claims the authority to regulate almost everything. No institution issuing more than 250 tonnes of C02 per year, will be above the EPA control – over one million residential complexes, hospitals, factories, schools, shops and other similar businesses.
The simplest statement of the executive (presidential)on behalf of the 'environment is the perfect realization of the prediction of Czech President Vaclav Klaus, that environmentalism has become the new socialism. Entering the possibility of even darker motives, Dr. Lindzen says one phase of the socialist world – the licensor of U.S. sovereihnity the United Nations, with the domination of the United Nations ultra-liberal (NC)-Arab Islamic countries control oil.
Such are serious concerns expressed by otherscientists, including the cost of the United Nations 'fraud' on Climate Change – Dr Philip Lloyd, Honorary Research Fellow at the Center for Energy Research, University of Cape Town, South Africa, was one of the authors to coordinate the UN IPCC. According to Dr. Lloyd, the IPCC should be dismissed as an authority on global warming – in an article published on the website of South Africa's BusinessDay. Lloyd writes about the "flaws behind the whole process" of the IPCC
TheIPCC "claims to have thousands of scientists and critics about the same amount to produce their reports." However, Lloyd said he had not considered "in the usual sense of the term -. There was no independent review, and anonymous reviewers were, but all the results are not scientific."
Another problem mentioned by Lloyd to present a summary of the IPCC (for politicians) four months or more before the scientific report (which is supposed to be based) is published.
Lloyd concludes:"There is no need to list all the changes that have been identified between what scientists actually said and what the politicians who wrote the summary for policy-makers said they said. The process is so flawed, the result is equivalent to fraud. as authority, the IPCC should be relegated to the scrap away. "
Lloyd was the first article of the scandal known as climategate, who questioned the validity of some of the science that supports the conclusion of the IPCCman of global warming.
On a related note, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, after the eruption of the dispute climategate recognized that support for the science of global warming, man can not be "safe, as claimed by its supporters." The common sense of the commentators on the world stage, like Charles Krauthammer, trying to find an explanation for the phenomenon of global warming, described him as "environmentalism – the new religion of the liberal left."
Cover Meter Concrete